Thursday, February 23, 2012

Intro to Synthesis (not completed yet)


The conceptualization and deep analysis of power in our modern day society is definitely not an easy task. When understanding power and everything it entails, one must approach the topic from various angles and perspectives to obtain a sound reasoning of it all. On one hand, we see people that have managed to obtain immense quantities of power and control, and on the other hand, we see the exact opposite: the victims of such authority and supremacy. This alone leaves for room for debate, simply meaning that whoever is discussing the theory of power may well lie on either side of the spectrum, and thus no conclusive argument should be accepted at that time. A full range of analysis is needed and must be made. There are different tools and methods that can be used to interpret the meaning of power, and throughout the class, three unique works were used, each discussing a different standpoint and inclination of what power is and how it is incorporated and seen throughout society today.

Monday, February 20, 2012

A Note on Panopticism

Foucault begins Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison by explaining the sense of order instilled by fear in the seventeenth century due to the plague. No one wanted to get sick, and with that in mind, the only sense of protection and well-being one had was to stay inside the comfort of their own home. He uses this tragedy in history to present us with his personal ideology on Bentham's panopticon model. He goes on to with a brief explanation of how the structure actually is in theory: "at the periphery, an annular building; at the center, a tower; this tower is pierced with wide windows that open onto the inner side of the ring; the peripheral building is divided into cells, each of which extends the whole width of the building" (225). With this architectural model, we understand that "the surveillance is permanent in its effects even if it is discontinuous in its action" (288). This "permanent effect" is possible because the watchmen in the tower are invisible to the quarantined. Reversely, the inmates are split in separated into individual cells, unable to have any communication or contact with any other inmates. More importantly, the inmates have no notion of who is watching, and when. For this reason, they are to remain in their best behavior. Foucault then moves on by comparing the panopticon to other institutions in our society today by stating: "Is it surprising that prisons resemble factories, schools, barracks, hospitals, which all resemble prisons?" (309). It actually comes as no surprise that governments and societal systems move and work in an invisible fashion, almost as if instilling a fear that we are uncertain and uninformed about. For this reason, we as members of society have to abide to our disciplines and basically play by the rules so no punishment is necessary, what ever it may be.

Thursday, February 9, 2012

Pollan Vs. Madsen

There is no doubt in my mind that Kyle Madsen has stated a few concerns that many readers like him would generally have when reading my essay "Why Bother?" His concerns are indeed valid, yet too general and textbook like. I would like to comment of his statement; "This intense angle of vision may leave out some readers. For example, I am left wondering why gardening is more effective than say, converting to solar power." Initially, one could see that maybe converting to solar power is more effective than gardening, but then I'll have to quickly say that you are comparing two completely different elements of society. One produces energy, the other one food. These two topics are on completely different magnitudes, and gardening is something that can be achieved at an individual level. Using solar power is something that we have no access of creating alone, and probably lies in the power of the government and electrical companies to decide upon.

Moreover, Madsen clearly doesn't understand my emphasis on gardening and why I actually took the liberty in doing so. It's not merely to create your own food supply and hope that your efforts alone reduce your carbon footsteps, and with that, slowly make a big impact on the environment. Instead, my goal is to create a sense of good habits that will in turn, generate a chain reaction amongst other people that will collectively make a change in our lives for ourselves, instead of being "passive, delegated, dependent for solutions on specialists."